Apparently there are some really awesome results of the recent Supreme-o Court ruling on "First Amendment rights of corporations". Like getting to spend an unrestricted amount of money in the hopes of influencing elections. Money can only do good things for democracy!
I fully support this. In theory individuals and corporations are equally incentivized to provide public goods, so what's the difference beyond individual whim and calculated group decision-making?
I fully support this. In theory individuals and corporations are equally incentivized to provide public goods, so what's the difference beyond individual whim and calculated group decision-making?
ReplyDelete